Inter-Viewing May 8, 1991 Minutes by Vanessa: USING INTERVIEWING AS A RESOURCE FOR WRITTEN WORK: The aim of today's workshop, Angelica said, was to concentrate on how we can use interviewing as a resource for written material in our journals. Angelica voiced concern as to how to know whether to write up an interview objectively or subjectively. Katherine suggested using interviews in a more creative way; to let go of trying to contain an interview in a certain way by letting it have a life of its own. We discussed the various ways in which to use interviewing as a resource for information and for writing. Vanessa talked about an interview project that Beth Wohlleb had done in Africa about creativity. Beth had many great conversations and a heap of resourceful material. After letting this material lie for a couple of weeks she put it together as a story involving a little girl and a frog. The story encompassed the material from the interviews in a very creative way, and the interviews were listed at the end of this story as an interview bibliography. Jessica said that she had done the latter in her learning plan this semester: as part of her list of resources she included people, peers, and friends. Jon-Paul said that "yes, even the word interview, is very indicative of just that: inter - view." He emphasized that we are constantly interviewing one another; the views that you have and the views that other people have. In a piece of writing using the interviewing resources, you do the connecting between your views and the other person's views. THE ACTUAL INTERVIEW: We discussed the range of interviews that happen from the very formal to the everday conversation. Interviews differ depending on whom one is interviewing and what kind of information one is looking for. An interview with someone in the medical profession for instance, might involve more focused and prepared questions than an interview with an artist about their creative process. In order to do an interview you just need to know what you want to know. From there, you can prepare either start-off questions that will lead into a discussion with new questions arising as the interview happens, or prepare a specific set of questions that are looking for very precise answers such as for statistical interviews. The interview can vary in its possible range of very-prepared, flexible, and spontaneous questions. One important thing that came out of this discussion was that, as with SO many things, we can break the inaccessibility of the concept of "interviewing." Let's not put "interviewing" on an academic pedestal, as in: "interviewing is a thing I never do, and do not know how to do." WE ARE MORE SKILLED AT THIS THAN WE THINK WE ARE.---------------------- AFTER THE EXERCISE [interviewing each other in pairs] Vanessa and Jessica's inter-interviewing went on to the topic of approaching interviewing and the idea of using impressions you get from the interview-- impressions of body-language-- how people react to certain questions-- whether a question makes them uncomfortable, or whather they consider a certain question personal or not. Jessica emphasized how much of our information comes from talking to other people. For her experience at Greenham Common, most of her information came from just talking to people. It was particularly good, she said, to be able to "interview" over the space of a few days; to ask questions, and let others lie till the right moment came to ask them; and to enable the space and time for different questions to come up at different times. ... Vanessa stressed the importance of using interview in our writing without solely concentrating on the interview; by using just a quote or including just a paragraph that comes from an interview; or in order to back up a reflective essay as you do with book resources; or to kick off from a conversation or interview. ... Angelica and Jon-Paul questioned the use and fomulation of questions within an interview. They started competely free-form and tried to see what questions arose. Their quest for questioning questions led to other questions such as "what kinds of answers lead to other questions?" ... Miho and Chris also threw out the information that there is an entire school of thought that believes that "no interview is valid unless you share it with the interviewee and ask if it's a fair representation of their views." We discussed the "inter" part of "interviewing," and that your interpretation is also valid and important. ... Katherine and Natasha looked at where they would want to go with an interview on transportation in London; and decided that beginning with word associations was a productive way to start. From there they would ask their interviewee questions on class issues and transportation system, as well as what they might do to improve public transport in London. This led to a discussion on interview questions and the way in which questions can be manipulative, encouraging certain answers over other ones. Katherine talked about her sexuality project and how formal interviewing may provide a safer space in which peole could communicate their ideas to her.Facilitator: Angelica present: Angelica, Katherine, Jessica, Jon-Paul Hammond, Natasha, Miho, Chris, Vanessa