Interviews

Given that much of the focus of Friends World education involves people, it is probably not surprising that more material already exists on interviews than almost any other topic. The material from the 1991 Handbook of Inspiration below covers a number of exercises and ways of going about an interview. In the 1995 Workshop, we focused more on the logistics of interviewing.

Do your research before a formal interview; you may not want to waste your interviewee's time on stuff you could have found out some other way.

Tape recording would seem to be the easiest way to conduct an interview; all you do is talk, and write it down later at your leisure. However, make sure you know what your recorder can do, and don't keep it inside your coat pocket if that is going to muffle and garble all speech beyond comprehension. Not everybody is comfortable talking into a tape recorder. Assuming for the moment that we're all ethical enough not to record someone who doesn't want to be recorded, the next alternative is to take notes.

Shorthand would be an effective tool here, but few (if any) Friends World students have enough fluency in shorthand to make any use of it. The problem with ordinary note-taking is that you are bound to miss some of what is said. One solution is just to listen carefully, and take down what seems to be the most important information. One innovative solution that came up was to work in pairs, since with two people writing and/or remembering, each is more likely to fill in the gaps that the other person missed. Of course an interviewee might be intimidated by more than one person writing down her words, or by anyone writing at all.

Paul Theroux, the travel writer, makes a point of never writing people's speech while he is still in front of them. He has developed (over many years) the ability of interviewing without even a notepad, then writing it down hours later, usually over dinner or lunch. Such skill would probably take a lot of practice, but most of us are here for four years, and a lot of practice could probably be had with all the interviewing that Friends World students do.

Here are some interesting pages on interviewing excerpted from the 1991 Handbook of Inspiration (the workbook tips are at the end):
Inter-Viewing May 8, 1991
Minutes by Vanessa: USING INTERVIEWING AS A RESOURCE FOR WRITTEN WORK: The aim of today's workshop, Angelica said, was to concentrate on how we can use interviewing as a resource for written material in our journals. Angelica voiced concern as to how to know whether to write up an interview objectively or subjectively. Katherine suggested using interviews in a more creative way; to let go of trying to contain an interview in a certain way by letting it have a life of its own. We discussed the various ways in which to use interviewing as a resource for information and for writing. Vanessa talked about an interview project that Beth Wohlleb had done in Africa about creativity. Beth had many great conversations and a heap of resourceful material. After letting this material lie for a couple of weeks she put it together as a story involving a little girl and a frog. The story encompassed the material from the interviews in a very creative way, and the interviews were listed at the end of this story as an interview bibliography. Jessica said that she had done the latter in her learning plan this semester: as part of her list of resources she included people, peers, and friends. Jon-Paul said that "yes, even the word interview, is very indicative of just that: inter - view." He emphasized that we are constantly interviewing one another; the views that you have and the views that other people have. In a piece of writing using the interviewing resources, you do the connecting between your views and the other person's views. THE ACTUAL INTERVIEW: We discussed the range of interviews that happen from the very formal to the everday conversation. Interviews differ depending on whom one is interviewing and what kind of information one is looking for. An interview with someone in the medical profession for instance, might involve more focused and prepared questions than an interview with an artist about their creative process. In order to do an interview you just need to know what you want to know. From there, you can prepare either start-off questions that will lead into a discussion with new questions arising as the interview happens, or prepare a specific set of questions that are looking for very precise answers such as for statistical interviews. The interview can vary in its possible range of very-prepared, flexible, and spontaneous questions. One important thing that came out of this discussion was that, as with SO many things, we can break the inaccessibility of the concept of "interviewing." Let's not put "interviewing" on an academic pedestal, as in: "interviewing is a thing I never do, and do not know how to do." WE ARE MORE SKILLED AT THIS THAN WE THINK WE ARE.
----------------------
AFTER THE EXERCISE [interviewing each other in pairs] Vanessa and Jessica's inter-interviewing went on to the topic of approaching interviewing and the idea of using impressions you get from the interview-- impressions of body-language-- how people react to certain questions-- whether a question makes them uncomfortable, or whather they consider a certain question personal or not. Jessica emphasized how much of our information comes from talking to other people. For her experience at Greenham Common, most of her information came from just talking to people. It was particularly good, she said, to be able to "interview" over the space of a few days; to ask questions, and let others lie till the right moment came to ask them; and to enable the space and time for different questions to come up at different times. ... Vanessa stressed the importance of using interview in our writing without solely concentrating on the interview; by using just a quote or including just a paragraph that comes from an interview; or in order to back up a reflective essay as you do with book resources; or to kick off from a conversation or interview. ... Angelica and Jon-Paul questioned the use and fomulation of questions within an interview. They started competely free-form and tried to see what questions arose. Their quest for questioning questions led to other questions such as "what kinds of answers lead to other questions?" ... Miho and Chris also threw out the information that there is an entire school of thought that believes that "no interview is valid unless you share it with the interviewee and ask if it's a fair representation of their views." We discussed the "inter" part of "interviewing," and that your interpretation is also valid and important. ... Katherine and Natasha looked at where they would want to go with an interview on transportation in London; and decided that beginning with word associations was a productive way to start. From there they would ask their interviewee questions on class issues and transportation system, as well as what they might do to improve public transport in London. This led to a discussion on interview questions and the way in which questions can be manipulative, encouraging certain answers over other ones. Katherine talked about her sexuality project and how formal interviewing may provide a safer space in which peole could communicate their ideas to her.
Facilitator: Angelica present: Angelica, Katherine, Jessica, Jon-Paul Hammond, Natasha, Miho, Chris, Vanessa

discussWorkshop Discussion Sparks inspiredInspired and Creative workRigorous Training panicAAAAAGGGHHHH! xrefSee Also
recycle
Contribute to the Portfolio Resource Guide!!!


Previous Page      Up to Category      Next Page

Contents      Index      Front Page

Friends World Home
globe